Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 06:11

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Has a cop ever said something to you which was completely unexpected?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Elon Musk Says XAI Will Retrain Grok: 'Far Too Much Garbage' - Business Insider
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Father’s Day 2025: 28 gifts dads will actually want - The Verge
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
PC modding repository Nexus Mods has a new owner - The Verge
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Is a light therapy mask a good investment?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Why do companies cull employees during financial downturns without saying so?
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Starbucks CEO admits the struggling chain made a major mistake - TheStreet